QUALITY SYSTEMSINDEX

Evidence for how production quality is controlled.

Coverage desk

Statistical Software Change Control

Source-backed reporting and analysis connected to the companies, capabilities, authorities, and operating domains it affects.

Arena's connected BOM, DHF, and DMR remain separate records

Arena says its product-centric QMS connects quality and product records including BOMs, design history files, device master records, SOPs, CAPAs, and training. A shared platform can preserve relationships among them, but no single current product record can answer design-history, manufacturing-definition, and executed-build questions at once.

GainSeeker's Send To AI needs an export-and-review receipt

Hertzler says GainSeeker 10.2.2 can send SPC or DMS statistics, charts, and operator notes to an AI engine selected by the user. That handoff needs a controlled export record and qualified review before an external model's response influences a process, investigation, specification, disposition, or release.

Supplios supplier access needs project-part-document scoping

Supplios says suppliers can upload PPAP and APQP material through a permission-based portal and see only the projects, parts, tasks, and documents relevant to them. That claim creates a concrete manufacturing access-control test: each external user's permissions should resolve to an exact supplier relationship and an effective project-part-task-document scope.

SQCpack upgrades need reproducible calculation evidence

PQ Systems maintains separate SQCpack version 7 and version 8 release paths, release history, validation resources, and a way to identify the installed version. Quality teams should preserve the application build, configuration, formulas, data, limits, filters, output, exception, and approval needed to reproduce every relied-on control chart or capability study after an upgrade.

An Intelex management-of-change workflow needs an execution cutover record

Intelex presents integrated document management, management of change, quality planning, nonconformance, and corrective-action applications. A change can be approved inside that system and still fail operationally unless the new baseline, affected work, training, implementation evidence, and rollback boundary are reconciled at the point of execution.

An Epicor QMS disposition needs inventory-status reconciliation

Epicor documents quality workflows for inspections, nonconformance, material review, corrective action, and reporting inside Kinetic production management. A disposition can authorize what should happen to nonconforming material, but the plant still needs to reconcile that decision with the physical quantity, location, inventory status, work order, and downstream transactions before product can move safely.

An Isolocity part inspection does not establish process stability

Isolocity presents part inspection connected with real-time statistical process control inside its quality platform. A conforming inspected unit supports that unit's disposition under the sampled characteristics, but it does not prove that the process is stable, capable, correctly measured, or safe to release without the separate controls defined by the manufacturer.

An InfinityQS Enact alert is not a nonconformance disposition

Advantive describes Enact as a cloud SPC platform that detects variation and out-of-control conditions, sends alerts when limits are exceeded, and can trigger corrective workflows. The signal may demand immediate action, but product disposition still needs identified material, evidence, authority, scope, and downstream control.

Minitab Real-Time SPC keeps process alerts separate from capability analysis

Minitab presents real-time control charts, rules, and alerts alongside process-capability analysis. An alert identifies evidence of unusual variation under a monitoring rule; a capability result answers a different question about process output relative to specifications and should not be inferred from the alert state.

IAQG opens its 2026 auditor-recognition transition window

The centrally managed authentication program introduces dated recognition, freeze, and eligibility milestones for auditors in the aviation, space, and defense certification scheme.